CivilsTap, 2nd Floor, SCO 91-92-93, Sector 34A, Chandigarh, 160022

28 April 2026: MAINS CURRENT AFFAIRS | Complete Exam Preparation

MAINS Current Affairs includes India Fertiliser Crisis: How India Fertiliser Crisis Deepens Amid Iran War and Supply Shocks & Freebies & Cash Transfers in India

Economy

1. India Fertiliser Crisis: How India Fertiliser Crisis Deepens Amid Iran War and Supply Shocks

Context: Recent geopolitical tensions (such as the US–Iran conflict) and possible disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz have raised concerns about supply shortages of fertilisers in India, which remains heavily dependent on Gulf imports.

Indian Agriculture & Role of Fertilisers

  • Agriculture remains the backbone of India’s economy, employing nearly 45% of the workforce.
  • Fertilisers played a crucial role in boosting productivity during the Green Revolution, alongside irrigation and high-yielding variety (HYV) seeds.
    • HYV seeds require intensive nutrient inputs; without fertilisers, their yield potential declines significantly.
  • India transitioned from food scarcity in the 1960s to foodgrain surplus, largely due to these modern inputs.
  • Today, food security continues to rely significantly on fertiliser availability, much of which is imported from West Asia.

India’s Dependence on the Persian Gulf for Fertilisers

  • Extent of Dependence:
    • India is among the largest importers of urea and DAP
    • Import reliance:
      • Urea ~18%
      • Phosphatic fertilisers (DAP) ~50–60%
      • Potash: almost 100%
    • Dependence on Inputs:
      • Even domestic fertiliser production depends on imported raw materials such as natural gas, ammonia, phosphoric acid, and sulphur.
      • This makes the sector import-dependent at multiple stages.
    • Key Gulf Suppliers:
      • Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates
      • These countries benefit from abundant natural gas and strategic trade routes.
    • Global Dominance:
      • The Gulf region is a major exporter of nitrogen-based fertilisers and a key supplier of phosphatic fertilisers.
      • Around 50% of global sulphur trade passes through the Strait of Hormuz.

Reasons Behind India’s Dependence

  • Structural Constraints:
    • Limited domestic reserves of phosphate and potash
    • Inadequate natural gas availability
    • High energy costs in fertiliser production
  • Policy-Related Factors:
    • Subsidy structure reduces efficiency incentives
    • Insufficient investment in domestic production capacity
    • Nearly 90% import dependence in phosphatic fertilisers

Implications of High Dependence

  • Strategic Risks:
    • Exposure to geopolitical tensions in West Asia and supply disruptions via the Strait of Hormuz
  • Economic Risks:
    • Rising import bills and increasing subsidy burden on the government
  • Agricultural Risks:
    • Price volatility affects farmers’ input costs and may impact crop yields
  • Environmental Concerns:
    • Overuse of chemical fertilisers leads to soil degradation
    • Nitrogen fertilisers contribute to greenhouse gas emissions
    • Ammonia production is energy- and water-intensive

Economic Burden

  • On Farmers:
    • Fertilisers account for ~16% of paid-out costs (subsidised)
    • At market prices, costs may rise up to 50%
    • Estimated expenditure:
      • Wheat: ₹4,500–₹6,500 per acre
      • Paddy: ₹4,500–₹7,000 per acre
    • On Government:
      • Subsidy expenditure rises with global price increases
      • Urea price remains fixed (₹242 per bag since 2018)
      • Leads to fiscal strain and pressure on foreign exchange reserves

Pathways to Reduce Dependence

Agroecological Approaches

  • Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF):
    • Covers large areas (e.g., Andhra Pradesh), reduces input costs by 20–50%
  • Organic Farming (Sikkim Model):
    • Demonstrates sustainable productivity gains
  • Integrated Nutrient Management:
    • Combines organic and chemical inputs, reducing fertiliser usage by 25–40%

Technological Solutions

  • Green Ammonia Production:
    • Uses renewable energy for fertiliser production
    • Reduces reliance on fossil fuels and imports

Lessons from Global Experience

  • The case of Sri Lanka highlights that abrupt bans on chemical fertilisers can reduce yields significantly (up to 40%) and destabilize the economy.
  • Transition to sustainable agriculture must therefore be gradual and evidence-based.

Way Forward

  • Policy Measures:
    • Rationalise fertiliser subsidies
    • Promote biofertilisers and composting
    • Invest in domestic production and green ammonia
    • Shift towards direct income support for farmers
  • Strategic Measures:
    • Diversify import sources
    • Build strategic fertiliser reserves
    • Strengthen supply chain resilience
  • Environmental Measures:
    • Encourage sustainable agricultural practices
    • Align fertiliser policies with climate commitments (NDCs)

Conclusion

  • India’s dependence on Gulf-origin fertilisers creates strategic and economic vulnerabilities.
  • A balanced approach combining diversification, domestic capacity building, and sustainable agricultural practices is essential to ensure long-term food security.

Indian Economy

2. Freebies & Cash Transfers in India

Context: Recent State Assembly elections saw a surge in promises such as cash transfers, free electricity, transport, and consumer goods. While often labelled as populist, these measures are also linked to inclusive growth, poverty reduction, and demand stimulation, though concerns about fiscal sustainability remain.

What are Freebies & Cash Transfers?

  • Freebies refer to goods or services provided either free of cost or at highly subsidized rates, often for welfare or political considerations (e.g., free power, water, laptops, bicycles, public transport).
  • Cash Transfers involve direct monetary support to beneficiaries, typically through the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT)
  • Since the 2010s, India’s welfare approach has increasingly shifted towards direct transfers, enabled by Aadhaar-linked systems for better efficiency.

Major Examples:

  • PM-KISAN: ₹6,000 per year to farmers as income support
  • PMGKAY: Large-scale food security programme (~₹2 lakh crore annually)
  • MGNREGA: Rural employment guarantee (~₹80,000 crore–₹1 lakh crore annually)

Key Mechanisms / Tools

  • Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT): Transfers funds directly into bank accounts to minimize leakages
  • JAM Trinity (Jan Dhan–Aadhaar–Mobile): Digital backbone of welfare delivery
  • Public Distribution System (PDS): Subsidized food grain distribution
  • MGNREGA: Wage-based employment support
  • Centrally Sponsored Schemes: Pensions, scholarships, and income support programmes

Benefits of Freebies & Cash Transfers

  • Poverty Reduction:
    • Direct support enhances basic consumption and prevents extreme deprivation (e.g., PMGKAY during COVID-19).
  • Boost to Demand:
    • Lower-income households tend to spend more, increasing rural demand, benefiting FMCG and MSMEs.
    • NSSO data shows a gradual shift toward non-food expenditure, indicating improving living standards.
  • Inclusive Growth:
    • Helps reduce inequality and supports vulnerable sections of society.
  • Women Empowerment:
    • Transfers to women improve financial autonomy and household outcomes.
    • Free transport schemes have improved female mobility and reduced dropout rates.
  • Social Security:
    • Acts as a safety net during economic shocks; programmes like MGNREGA support livelihoods.
  • Improved Delivery Efficiency:
    • DBT and digitization reduce corruption and intermediary leakages.

Key Concerns & Challenges

  • Fiscal Pressure:
    • High subsidy burdens strain state finances and risk breaching FRBM limits (3–3.5% of GSDP).
  • Populism vs Productivity:
    • Competitive politics may encourage short-term giveaways over long-term investments.
  • Trade-off with Capital Expenditure:
    • Excessive spending on freebies can crowd out investments in infrastructure, health, and education.
  • Moral Hazard:
    • Risk of dependency and reduced work incentives among beneficiaries.
  • Targeting Errors:
    • Inclusion and exclusion errors reduce effectiveness.
  • Resource Misallocation:
    • Free electricity can lead to overuse of groundwater and distort economic signals.
  • Difficult Exit:
    • Once introduced, such schemes are politically hard to withdraw.

Way Forward

  • Targeted Welfare Instead of Universal Freebies:
    • Use data-driven identification to ensure benefits reach the needy.
  • Gradual Adoption of Universal Basic Income (UBI):
    • Suggested in the Economic Survey 2016–17 as a possible replacement for multiple subsidies.
  • Balance Growth and Welfare:
    • Maintain equilibrium between capital expenditure (growth) and transfers (equity).
    • Focus on quality of spending, not just classification.
  • Strengthen DBT Infrastructure:
    • Expand financial inclusion and digital systems.
  • Ensure Fiscal Transparency:
    • Clearly distinguish between merit subsidies and non-essential freebies.
    • Consider independent fiscal oversight mechanisms.
  • Outcome-Oriented Welfare:
    • Link benefits to outcomes in education and health (conditional transfers).
  • Promote Employment Generation:
    • Focus on skill development, industrial growth, and job creation to reduce long-term dependency.

Conclusion

  • Labelling all cash transfers as mere “freebies” oversimplifies their role. When well-targeted and fiscally managed, they enhance demand, reduce inequality, and act as economic stabilizers.
  • In a country like India, where structural inequalities persist, such transfers remain important policy tools, at least until growth becomes more employment-intensive.

Download Pdf | Study Material | Downloads | Daily Quiz  | FREE Youtube Videos

Leave Comment