CivilsTap, 2nd Floor, SCO 91-92-93, Sector 34A, Chandigarh, 160022

05 May 2026: MAINS CURRENT AFFAIRS | Complete Exam Preparation

MAINS Current Affairs includes MSP in India: Measurement Gaps, Structural Limits & Need for Reform & Global Economic Risks and India’s Resilience

ECONOMY

1. MSP in India: Measurement Gaps, Structural Limits & Need for Reform

Context

  • Concerns have emerged that outdated cost calculations and weak procurement systems are reducing the effectiveness of Minimum Support Price (MSP), leading to calls for reform.

About Minimum Support Price (MSP)

  • MSP is the minimum assured price at which the government procures crops from farmers to protect them from price volatility and ensure food security.
  • It was introduced during the Green Revolution (1966–67) following the establishment of the Agricultural Prices Commission (now CACP).

Coverage:

  • 22 crops (14 Kharif, 6 Rabi, 2 commercial crops)
  • Plus Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) for sugarcane

Objectives:

  • Ensure remunerative returns to farmers
  • Prevent distress sales
  • Maintain food security

Institutional Framework

  • Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP):
    • Recommends MSP based on production costs, demand-supply, and price trends
  • Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA):
    • Final authority approving MSP
  • MSP follows a cost-plus approach, targeting at least 50% margin over A2+FL cost

Cost Concepts in MSP

  • A2: Actual paid-out expenses (inputs, labour, fuel, etc.)
  • A2 + FL: Includes imputed family labour
  • C2: Comprehensive cost (A2+FL + rent of land + interest on capital)
  • Cost data is generated through the Comprehensive Scheme for Cost of Cultivation under the Directorate of Economics & Statistics.

Limitations in MSP Framework

  • Time Lag in Cost Estimation:
    • Uses data that is often 2–3 years old, leading to underestimation during inflationary periods
    • Real-time costs may be significantly higher (20–30% in some cases)
  • Changing Mechanisation Patterns:
    • Shift from owned machinery to service-based models is not fully captured in surveys
  • Limited Procurement Coverage:
    • Effective procurement largely restricted to rice and wheat through agencies like FCI
    • Many farmers sell below MSP for other crops
  • Distorted Cropping Patterns:
    • Procurement incentives encourage rice-wheat monoculture in states like Punjab and Haryana
    • Diversification seen in states with better market systems

MSP as a Structural Issue

  • The problem is not just pricing but also:
    • Measurement gaps (inaccurate cost estimation)
    • Transmission failures (weak procurement reach)

Outcome:

  • Works relatively well in stable conditions
  • Fails to ensure profitability during volatile periods

Reforming MSP System

Short-Term Measures:

  • Update cost calculations using real-time data
  • Index MSP to volatile inputs like fuel and fertilisers
  • Focus procurement reforms in pulses and oilseeds

Medium-Term Measures:

  • Increase sampling frequency and regional coverage
  • Use digital tools and remote sensing for cost tracking

Fiscal Impact:

  • Likely manageable compared to benefits such as improved farmer incomes and policy credibility

Recent Government Initiatives

  • PM-AASHA Scheme:
    • Ensures MSP implementation through procurement (PSS)
  • Pulse Self-Sufficiency Target:
    • 100% procurement of key pulses (tur, urad, masoor) till 2028–29
  • Digital Platforms:
    • e-Samridhi and e-Samyukti improve transparency and efficiency

Conclusion

  • MSP has been crucial for farmer protection, price stability, and food security.
  • However, evolving agricultural conditions demand modernised cost estimation and stronger procurement mechanisms.

Way Forward:

  • Adopt a data-driven and adaptive MSP framework
  • Strengthen procurement and market linkages
  • Ensure gradual, non-disruptive reforms

ECONOMY

2. Global Economic Risks and India’s Resilience

Context

  • The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently highlighted that geo-economic fragmentation (GEF)—driven by tariffs, trade barriers, and strategic policies—is reshaping global supply chains and disrupting capital flows.

What is Geo-Economic Fragmentation (GEF)?

  • GEF refers to a policy-driven reversal of global economic integration, influenced by geopolitical and security considerations rather than market forces.
  • It involves disruptions across key channels such as:
    • Trade
    • Capital flows
    • Migration
    • Technology diffusion
  • Unlike natural de-globalisation, GEF is state-led, arising from measures like sanctions, export controls, and industrial subsidies.

Implications of Geo-Economic Fragmentation

  1. Financial and Market Risks
  • Increased volatility in global financial markets
  • Risk of systemic crises similar to past financial shocks
  • Asset price bubbles, especially in technology sectors
  • Rapid growth of private credit markets with limited regulation
  1. Macroeconomic Vulnerabilities
  • Rising public debt due to post-pandemic fiscal expansion
  • Delays in fiscal consolidation
  • Increased defence spending due to geopolitical tensions
  1. External Sector Pressures
  • Volatile energy prices and currency fluctuations
  • Supply chain disruptions (shift toward security-driven production, e.g., China+1 strategy)
  • Fragmentation of financial flows and reduced capital mobility
  1. Growth and Structural Challenges
  • Slower global growth due to tight monetary policies
  • India’s growth moderating (from ~8.2% average to ~6.5–7%)
  • Challenges in financial market depth and participation
  1. Technology Risks (AI)
  • Uncertain business sustainability
  • Uneven diffusion across economies
  • Job displacement and skill mismatches

India’s Resilience Amid GEF

  • Diversified Trade Structure: Reduces dependence on specific regions
  • Strong Forex Reserves: Around 11 months of import cover
  • Manageable CAD: External imbalance remains under control
  • Robust Capital Flows: Continued FDI inflows, especially in finance and technology
  • Growth Drivers:
    • Strong domestic consumption
    • Public capital expenditure
    • Crowding-in of private investment

Policy Responses & Way Forward

Global Level:

  • Strengthen multilateral cooperation (IMF, WTO reforms)
  • Promote dialogue to manage fragmentation

India’s Strategy:

  • Maintain macroeconomic stability
  • Improve ease of doing business
  • Focus on inclusive and sustainable growth

RBI’s Role:

  • Monitor systemic risks
  • Ensure financial stability
  • Implement timely policy interventions

Financial Market Reforms:

  • Deepen government securities market
  • Diversify derivatives for better risk management
  • Enhance participation in forex markets
  • Develop credit derivatives
  • Strengthen role of banks and primary dealers as market-makers
  • Improve global integration, transparency, and ethical conduct

Conclusion

  • Geo-economic fragmentation presents significant global risks, but India’s strong macroeconomic fundamentals and diversified economy provide resilience.
  • Sustained reforms, financial market development, and global cooperation will be key to navigating this evolving landscape.

Download Pdf | Study Material | Downloads | Daily Quiz  | FREE Youtube Videos

Leave Comment