CivilsTap, 2nd Floor, SCO 91-92-93, Sector 34A, Chandigarh, 160022

28 September 2026: MAINS CURRENT AFFAIRS | Complete Exam Preparation

MAINS Current Affairs includes Nuclear Waste Management in India & PRAHAAR: National Counter-Terror Policy

Science & Technology/Energy

1. Nuclear Waste Management in India

Context: India’s expanding nuclear power programme and the increasing participation of private entities in the nuclear sector have renewed attention towards the long-term financial, regulatory and institutional responsibilities associated with radioactive-waste management.

  • Unlike conventional industrial waste, radioactive waste may remain hazardous for extremely long periods, requiring specialised systems extending well beyond the operational life of a nuclear power plant.

About

  • Under a conventional once-through nuclear fuel cycle, used nuclear fuel is treated as waste and is ultimately intended for permanent disposal.
  • India follows a closed fuel-cycle approach, under which spent nuclear fuel is reprocessed to recover uranium and plutonium for further utilisation.
  • Consequently, India treats spent fuel not merely as waste but also as a potential source of reusable nuclear material.
  • Reprocessing can substantially reduce the volume of high-level waste requiring geological disposal.
  • However, reprocessing does not eliminate radioactivity; radioactive residues still require safe conditioning, storage and eventual disposal.

Management of Nuclear Fuel

  1. Cooling and Interim Storage
  • Freshly discharged spent fuel remains highly radioactive and generates significant heat.
  • It therefore requires initial storage in cooling pools, followed by appropriate longer-term storage systems.
  1. Reprocessing
  • Spent nuclear fuel can undergo chemical reprocessing to recover reusable materials, particularly:
    • Uranium; and
    • Plutonium.
  • These recovered materials can subsequently be utilised in the nuclear fuel cycle.
  1. Waste Conditioning
  • Radioactive residues that cannot be reused need to be converted into stable and durable forms.
  • One such approach involves vitrification, in which high-level radioactive waste is incorporated into a stable glass-like matrix for long-term storage.
  1. Final Disposal
  • Long-lived high-level radioactive waste ultimately requires isolation from the environment.
  • The generally accepted long-term approach is disposal in a deep geological repository, designed to isolate radioactive material over very long time periods.

Geological Repository

  • A deep geological repository is a specialised facility designed to isolate long-lived radioactive waste deep underground within suitable geological formations.
  • It relies on multiple layers of containment and natural geological barriers to prevent radioactive material from reaching the surrounding environment.
  • A geological repository differs fundamentally from an interim storage facility:
    • Interim storage: Provides controlled storage for a limited or extended period while further management decisions are undertaken.
    • Geological repository: Designed for long-term isolation and final disposal.
  • India has been examining the requirement for geological disposal as part of its long-term nuclear-waste management strategy.

Need for Long-Term Waste Management

  1. Intergenerational Responsibility
  • Radioactive waste can remain hazardous for extremely long periods, making its management fundamentally different from ordinary industrial waste.
  • Present generations therefore have a responsibility to ensure that future generations are not left with unmanaged environmental and financial liabilities.
  1. Financial Uncertainty
  • Nuclear-waste management and geological disposal involve substantial costs that may arise decades after a nuclear reactor begins operation.
  • Without dedicated financial arrangements, these future liabilities could disproportionately fall on the government and taxpayers.
  1. Institutional Continuity
  • Nuclear power plants may operate for several decades, whereas radioactive-waste management and monitoring can continue for considerably longer.
  • Responsibilities therefore need to remain clearly defined even when:
    • An operator changes ownership;
    • A private entity exits the sector; or
    • A nuclear facility reaches the end of its operational life.

What are the Concerns?

  1. Increasing Private Participation
  • India’s nuclear sector is opening up to greater private-sector participation.
  • This creates a need to clearly establish responsibility across the entire nuclear fuel cycle, including spent fuel, radioactive waste, decommissioning and final disposal.
  1. Public Acceptance
  • Communities may resist the establishment of radioactive-waste facilities because of concerns regarding:
    • Human health;
    • Environmental safety;
    • Long-term contamination; and
    • Land-use implications.
  • Public confidence and transparent consultation are therefore important for the successful implementation of long-term waste-management facilities.
  1. Institutional and Regulatory Continuity
  • Radioactive-waste management requires continuous monitoring, regulatory oversight and adherence to safety standards over extremely long timeframes.
  • There are concerns about ensuring that institutional mechanisms remain effective throughout these periods.
  1. Financial Provisioning
  • Adequate financial arrangements are necessary to meet waste-management and disposal costs that may arise decades after a nuclear power plant has stopped operating.
  • Clearly defined financial liability becomes particularly important with increasing participation of private operators.

Way Ahead

  1. Create a Dedicated Nuclear Waste Fund
  • A ring-fenced nuclear-waste management fund could be established through a levy linked to nuclear electricity generation.
  • Contributions could accumulate throughout the operating life of a nuclear plant and subsequently finance:
    • Waste storage;
    • Transportation;
    • Decommissioning; and
    • Final disposal.
  1. Clearly Define Operator Responsibilities
  • Nuclear regulations should explicitly specify the financial and operational responsibilities of private operators for:
    • Spent fuel;
    • Radioactive waste;
    • Long-term storage; and
    • Decommissioning-related obligations.
  1. Begin Early Repository Planning
  • India does not necessarily need to construct a geological repository immediately.
  • However, systematic planning should begin well in advance through:
    • Site identification;
    • Geological investigations;
    • Safety assessments; and
    • Meaningful public consultation.
  1. Apply the Polluter-Pays Principle
  • The costs associated with radioactive-waste management should be internalised into the economics of nuclear power.
  • The financial burden should not be transferred disproportionately to future taxpayers or generations.

Conclusion

  • India’s transition towards a larger nuclear-power programme requires waste management to be treated as an integral part of the nuclear fuel cycle, rather than as an issue to be addressed only after waste is generated.
  • A combination of closed-fuel-cycle practices, safe conditioning and storage, long-term geological-disposal planning, dedicated financial provisions and clearly assigned institutional responsibilities can strengthen India’s nuclear sustainability.
  • With greater private participation, establishing clear lifetime liability and accountability will be essential for maintaining public confidence and ensuring that nuclear energy remains a reliable component of India’s long-term energy security.

Internal Security

2. PRAHAAR: National Counter-Terror Policy

Context: The Union Home Minister inaugurated a conference on ‘PRAHAAR – CT Policy and Strategy’ in New Delhi.

  • The conference focuses on India’s evolving counter-terrorism framework and the implementation of the national strategy.

What is PRAHAAR?

  • The Ministry of Home Affairs unveiled ‘PRAHAAR’ on 23 February 2026 as India’s first comprehensive National Counter-Terrorism Policy & Strategy.
  • It provides an integrated framework for addressing a broad spectrum of terrorism-related threats, including:
    • Cross-border terrorism;
    • Global extremist organisations such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS;
    • Drone-based threats;
    • Encrypted communication;
    • Cyber-attacks;
    • Crypto-based terrorist financing; and
    • CBRNED threats — Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosive and Digital threats.
  • PRAHAAR follows a seven-pillar strategy centred on:
    • Intelligence-led prevention;
    • Rapid and coordinated response;
    • Capacity building;
    • Human rights and rule-of-law compliance;
    • De-radicalisation;
    • International cooperation; and
    • Societal recovery and resilience.
  • Rather than establishing an entirely new institutional architecture, the policy seeks to bring existing institutions and legal mechanisms—including the NIA, NSG, UAPA and CAPFs—within a common national counter-terrorism framework.

Importance of PRAHAAR

  1. First Comprehensive National Counter-Terrorism Policy
  • PRAHAAR provides a unified national framework for counter-terrorism efforts across different agencies and levels of government.
  • It seeks to improve coordination and establish a common strategic approach.
  1. Multi-Domain Protection
  • The strategy addresses threats across:
    • Land;
    • Air;
    • Water; and
  • It seeks to protect critical and strategically important sectors such as:
    • Power;
    • Railways;
    • Aviation;
    • Ports;
    • Defence;
    • Space; and
    • Atomic energy.
  1. Zero-Tolerance Principle
  • PRAHAAR reinforces India’s position that terrorism should not be associated with or justified on the basis of religion, ethnicity or nationality.
  • The focus is on countering terrorist organisations, networks, financing and enabling ecosystems.
  1. Capacity Building
  • The framework seeks to improve coordination and operational capabilities among:
    • Intelligence agencies;
    • Police forces; and
    • Paramilitary/Central Armed Police Forces.
  • This is particularly important as terrorist threats increasingly involve cyber tools, drones and other emerging technologies.
  1. Global Alignment
  • PRAHAAR strengthens India’s engagement with international counter-terrorism mechanisms.
  • It can support greater cooperation on issues such as terror financing, intelligence sharing, arms trafficking and extremist propaganda.

Emerging Challenges and Concerns of India’s Counter-Terror Architecture

  1. Cross-Border Terrorism
  • India continues to face the challenge of cross-border infiltration and support to terrorist groups, including alleged state-backed networks operating from neighbouring regions.
  1. Cyber-Enabled Threats
  • Nation-states and criminal groups can target India’s digital infrastructure and critical information systems.
  • Dark-web platforms can facilitate anonymous transactions involving:
    • Weapons;
    • Explosives; and
    • Stolen data.
  • This creates additional difficulties for intelligence agencies in tracking terrorist and criminal networks.
  1. Drone Warfare
  • Terrorist and criminal networks increasingly use drones for smuggling arms, ammunition and explosives.
  • Border areas, particularly in Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir, face growing challenges from such drone-enabled activities.
  1. Organised Crime–Terror Nexus
  • Terrorist organisations may collaborate with organised criminal networks for:
    • Logistics;
    • Financing;
    • Weapons procurement; and
  • The convergence of terrorism and organised crime therefore requires coordinated investigation and intelligence mechanisms.
  1. Radicalisation
  • Online propaganda and sleeper networks associated with extremist organisations such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS can be used to encourage radicalisation and violence.
  • Security agencies have also raised concerns about the use of AI-generated propaganda and automated bot networks in online radicalisation campaigns.
  1. Limited Specialised Counter-Terrorism Training
  • Several police forces continue to face shortages in specialised capabilities relating to:
    • Cyber intelligence;
    • Drone detection;
    • Digital surveillance; and
    • Advanced technological investigation.
  • Differences in State-level capabilities can create gaps in India’s overall counter-terrorism preparedness.

Way Ahead

  1. Strengthen Intelligence Integration
  • Establish stronger real-time information-sharing mechanisms between Central and State agencies.
  • Improve interoperability between intelligence, police and investigative databases.
  1. Upgrade Cyber Defence
  • Invest in AI-enabled monitoring and threat-detection systems.
  • Develop indigenous cybersecurity capabilities to protect critical digital infrastructure.
  1. Strengthen Counter-Drone Capabilities
  • Expand deployment of anti-drone technologies.
  • Combine technological countermeasures with stronger border surveillance and intelligence networks.
  1. Build Community Resilience
  • Develop awareness and prevention programmes to counter online radicalisation and extremist narratives.
  • Encourage participation of civil society and local governance institutions in community-level prevention efforts.
  1. Deepen International Cooperation
  • Strengthen cooperation with the United Nations and international partners against:
    • Terror financing;
    • Arms smuggling;
    • Cross-border networks; and
    • Extremist propaganda.
  1. Update Legal Frameworks
  • Periodically review and update anti-terror legislation to address emerging technological threats.
  • At the same time, ensure appropriate judicial oversight, due process and constitutional safeguards.
  1. Strengthen Victim Support
  • Institutionalise comprehensive systems for rehabilitation, compensation and long-term support for victims of terrorism.

Conclusion

  • PRAHAAR represents India’s first comprehensive institutional framework for counter-terrorism, combining prevention, proportionate response, capacity building, international cooperation and societal resilience.
  • Its effectiveness will depend substantially on implementation at the grassroots and State levels through:
    • Clear State-specific guidelines;
    • Capacity building of police and ATS units;
    • Effective intelligence sharing;
    • Inter-agency coordination; and
    • Community engagement.
  • Continuous monitoring will also be necessary to ensure that socio-economic interventions and whole-of-society measures are effectively integrated into India’s broader counter-terrorism planning.

Download Pdf | Study Material | Downloads | Daily Quiz  | FREE Youtube Videos

Leave Comment